Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro 400 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M

NVIDIA Quadro 400 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro 400 and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 2700M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro 400 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 8 months late
Lower TDP (32W vs 65W)
NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (51.14GB/s vs 12.32GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro 400
0.108 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 2700M +17%
0.127 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2011
Release Date
Aug 2008
Quadro
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-HE

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
770 MHz
Memory Clock
799 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
512MB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
12.32GB/s
Bandwidth
51.14GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
6
SM Count
6
48
Shading Units
48
16
TMUs
24
8
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
32 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

3.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.480 GPixel/s
7.200 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
12.72 GTexel/s
-
-
-
108.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
127.2 GFLOPS
-
-
-

Board Design

32W
TDP
65W
200 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GT216
GPU Name
G94
GT216 GL
GPU Variant
NB9E-GLM2
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
65 nm
0.486 billion
Transistors
0.505 billion
100 mm²
Die Size
240 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.2
CUDA
1.1
4.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy