Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro 400 vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 295

NVIDIA Quadro 400 vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 295

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro 400 and 256MB VRAM Quadro NVS 295 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro 400 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 11 months late
More VRAM (512GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (12.32GB/s vs 11.12GB/s)
40 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 295 's Advantages
Lower TDP (23W vs 32W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro 400 +414%
0.108 TFLOPS
Quadro NVS 295
0.021 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2011
Release Date
May 2009
Quadro
Generation
Quadro NVS
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
770 MHz
Memory Clock
695 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
256MB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
64bit
12.32GB/s
Bandwidth
11.12GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
6
SM Count
1
48
Shading Units
8
16
TMUs
4
8
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
32 KB
L2 Cache
16 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

3.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.160 GPixel/s
7.200 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.160 GTexel/s
-
-
-
108.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
20.80 GFLOPS
-
-
-

Board Design

32W
TDP
23W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort
Outputs
2x DisplayPort
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GT216
GPU Name
G98
GT216 GL
GPU Variant
-
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
65 nm
0.486 billion
Transistors
0.21 billion
100 mm²
Die Size
86 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.2
CUDA
1.1
4.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy