Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro 400 vs NVIDIA Quadro K2000M

NVIDIA Quadro 400 vs NVIDIA Quadro K2000M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro 400 and 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro 400 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 55W)
NVIDIA Quadro K2000M 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 2 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (28.80GB/s vs 12.32GB/s)
336 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro 400
0.108 TFLOPS
Quadro K2000M +429%
0.572 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2011
Release Date
Jun 2012
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
770 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR3
Memory Type
DDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
12.32GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s

Render Config

6
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
48
Shading Units
384
16
TMUs
32
8
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
32 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

3.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.960 GPixel/s
7.200 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
23.84 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
108.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
572.2 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
23.84 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GT216
GPU Name
GK107
GT216 GL
GPU Variant
N14P-Q3-A2
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.486 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
100 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²

Board Design

32W
TDP
55W
200 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
1.2
CUDA
3.0
4.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy