Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro 400 vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 Passive

NVIDIA Quadro 400 vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 Passive

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro 400 and 48GB VRAM Quadro RTX 8000 Passive to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro 400 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 260W)
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 Passive 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1620MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (672.0GB/s vs 12.32GB/s)
4560 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro 400
0.108 TFLOPS
Quadro RTX 8000 Passive +13724%
14.93 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2011
Release Date
Aug 2018
Quadro
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1230 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1620 MHz
770 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
48GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
384bit
12.32GB/s
Bandwidth
672.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
6
SM Count
72
48
Shading Units
4608
16
TMUs
288
8
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
576
-
RT Cores
72
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
32 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

3.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
155.5 GPixel/s
7.200 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
466.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
29.86 TFLOPS
108.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
14.93 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
466.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

32W
TDP
260W
200 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GT216
GPU Name
TU102
GT216 GL
GPU Variant
TU102-875-A1
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.486 billion
Transistors
18.6 billion
100 mm²
Die Size
754 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.2
CUDA
7.5
4.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy