Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro 400 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 2800M

NVIDIA Quadro 400 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 2800M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro 400 and 1024MB VRAM Quadro FX 2800M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro 400 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 4 months late
Lower TDP (32W vs 75W)
NVIDIA Quadro FX 2800M 's Advantages
More VRAM (1024GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (64.00GB/s vs 12.32GB/s)
48 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro 400
0.108 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 2800M +166%
0.288 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2011
Release Date
Dec 2009
Quadro
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
770 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
1024MB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
12.32GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

6
SM Count
12
-
Compute Units
-
48
Shading Units
96
16
TMUs
48
8
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
-
32 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB

Theoretical Performance

3.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
9.600 GPixel/s
7.200 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
28.80 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
108.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
288.0 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

GT216
GPU Name
G92
GT216 GL
GPU Variant
N10E-GLM
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
65 nm
0.486 billion
Transistors
0.754 billion
100 mm²
Die Size
324 mm²

Board Design

32W
TDP
75W
200 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.2
CUDA
1.1
4.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy