Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro 400 vs NVIDIA Quadro K5000 Mac Edition

NVIDIA Quadro 400 vs NVIDIA Quadro K5000 Mac Edition

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro 400 and 4GB VRAM Quadro K5000 Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro 400 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 122W)
NVIDIA Quadro K5000 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 4 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (172.8GB/s vs 12.32GB/s)
1488 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro 400
0.108 TFLOPS
Quadro K5000 Mac Edition +1908%
2.169 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2011
Release Date
Aug 2012
Quadro
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
770 MHz
Memory Clock
1350 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
12.32GB/s
Bandwidth
172.8GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
6
SM Count
-
48
Shading Units
1536
16
TMUs
128
8
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
32 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

3.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
22.59 GPixel/s
7.200 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
90.37 GTexel/s
-
-
-
108.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.169 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
90.37 GFLOPS

Board Design

32W
TDP
122W
200 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort
Outputs
2x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GT216
GPU Name
GK104
GT216 GL
GPU Variant
-
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.486 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
100 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
1.2
CUDA
3.0
4.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy