Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro 400 vs NVIDIA Quadro K5000M

NVIDIA Quadro 400 vs NVIDIA Quadro K5000M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro 400 and 4GB VRAM Quadro K5000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro 400 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 100W)
NVIDIA Quadro K5000M 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 4 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (96.00GB/s vs 12.32GB/s)
1296 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro 400
0.108 TFLOPS
Quadro K5000M +1395%
1.615 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2011
Release Date
Aug 2012
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
770 MHz
Memory Clock
750 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
12.32GB/s
Bandwidth
96.00GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
6
SM Count
-
48
Shading Units
1344
16
TMUs
112
8
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
32 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

3.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.83 GPixel/s
7.200 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
67.31 GTexel/s
-
-
-
108.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.615 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
67.31 GFLOPS

Board Design

32W
TDP
100W
200 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GT216
GPU Name
GK104
GT216 GL
GPU Variant
N14E-Q5-A2
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.486 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
100 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
1.2
CUDA
3.0
4.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy