Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro 400 vs NVIDIA Quadro K2000

NVIDIA Quadro 400 vs NVIDIA Quadro K2000

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro 400 and 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro 400 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 51W)
NVIDIA Quadro K2000 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 11 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (64.00GB/s vs 12.32GB/s)
336 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro 400
0.108 TFLOPS
Quadro K2000 +578%
0.733 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2011
Release Date
Mar 2013
Quadro
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
770 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
12.32GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

6
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
48
Shading Units
384
16
TMUs
32
8
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
32 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

3.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.632 GPixel/s
7.200 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
30.53 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
108.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
732.7 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
30.53 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GT216
GPU Name
GK107
GT216 GL
GPU Variant
GK107-301-A2
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.486 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
100 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²

Board Design

32W
TDP
51W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
1.2
CUDA
3.0
4.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy