Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro 400 vs NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Mobile

NVIDIA Quadro 400 vs NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Mobile

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro 400 and 6GB VRAM Quadro P3200 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro 400 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 75W)
NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1543MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (168.3GB/s vs 12.32GB/s)
1744 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro 400
0.108 TFLOPS
Quadro P3200 Mobile +5020%
5.53 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2011
Release Date
Feb 2018
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1328 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1543 MHz
770 MHz
Memory Clock
1753 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
6GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
192bit
12.32GB/s
Bandwidth
168.3GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
6
SM Count
14
48
Shading Units
1792
16
TMUs
112
8
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
32 KB
L2 Cache
1536 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

3.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
98.75 GPixel/s
7.200 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
172.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
86.41 GFLOPS
108.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.530 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
172.8 GFLOPS

Board Design

32W
TDP
75W
200 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GT216
GPU Name
GP104
GT216 GL
GPU Variant
-
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
16 nm
0.486 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
100 mm²
Die Size
314 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.2
CUDA
6.1
4.1
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy