Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro 400 vs NVIDIA Quadro P5200 Max Q

NVIDIA Quadro 400 vs NVIDIA Quadro P5200 Max Q

NVIDIA Quadro 400
VS
NVIDIA Quadro P5200 Max Q
NVIDIA Quadro 400
NVIDIA Quadro P5200 Max Q
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro 400 and 16GB VRAM Quadro P5200 Max Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro 400 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 100W)
NVIDIA Quadro P5200 Max Q 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1569MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (230.9GB/s vs 12.32GB/s)
2512 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro 400
0.108 TFLOPS
Quadro P5200 Max Q +7337%
8.033 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2011
Release Date
Feb 2018
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1316 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1569 MHz
770 MHz
Memory Clock
1804 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
16GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
12.32GB/s
Bandwidth
230.9GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
6
SM Count
20
48
Shading Units
2560
16
TMUs
160
8
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
32 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

3.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
100.4 GPixel/s
7.200 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
251.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
125.5 GFLOPS
108.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.033 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
251.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

32W
TDP
100W
200 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GT216
GPU Name
GP104
GT216 GL
GPU Variant
-
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
16 nm
0.486 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
100 mm²
Die Size
314 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.2
CUDA
6.1
4.1
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy