Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro 400 vs NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm

NVIDIA Quadro 400 vs NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro 400 and 6GB VRAM Tesla K20Xm to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro 400 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 235W)
NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 7 months late
More VRAM (6GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (249.6GB/s vs 12.32GB/s)
2640 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro 400
0.108 TFLOPS
Tesla K20Xm +3543%
3.935 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2011
Release Date
Nov 2012
Quadro
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
770 MHz
Memory Clock
1300 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
6GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
384bit
12.32GB/s
Bandwidth
249.6GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
6
SM Count
-
48
Shading Units
2688
16
TMUs
224
8
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
32 KB
L2 Cache
1536 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

3.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
40.99 GPixel/s
7.200 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
164.0 GTexel/s
-
-
-
108.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.935 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
1312 GFLOPS

Board Design

32W
TDP
235W
200 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GT216
GPU Name
GK110
GT216 GL
GPU Variant
-
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.486 billion
Transistors
7.08 billion
100 mm²
Die Size
561 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
1.2
CUDA
3.5
4.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy