CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA Quadro 400 vs NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 32 GB
NVIDIA Quadro 400 vs NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 32 GB
VS
NVIDIA Quadro 400
NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 32 GB
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro 400 and 32GB VRAM Tesla V100 SXM2 32 GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro 400 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 250W)
NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 32 GB 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1530MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (897.0GB/s vs 12.32GB/s)
5072 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro 400
0.108 TFLOPS
Tesla V100 SXM2 32 GB
+14409%
15.67 TFLOPS
Quadro 400
VS
Tesla V100 SXM2 32 GB
Graphics Card
Apr 2011
Release Date
Mar 2018
Quadro
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1290 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1530 MHz
770 MHz
Memory Clock
876 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
32GB
DDR3
Memory Type
HBM2
64bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
12.32GB/s
Bandwidth
897.0GB/s
Render Config
6
SM Count
80
-
Compute Units
-
48
Shading Units
5120
16
TMUs
320
8
ROPs
128
-
Tensor Cores
640
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
32 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB
Theoretical Performance
3.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
195.8 GPixel/s
7.200 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
489.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
31.33 TFLOPS
108.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
15.67 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
7.834 TFLOPS
Graphics Processor
GT216
GPU Name
GV100
GT216 GL
GPU Variant
-
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Volta
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.486 billion
Transistors
21.1 billion
100 mm²
Die Size
815 mm²
Board Design
32W
TDP
250W
200 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.2
CUDA
7.0
4.1
Shader Model
6.6
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA RTX A500 Embedded vs NVIDIA Quadro 400
2
Intel Data Center GPU Flex 140 vs NVIDIA Quadro 400
3
NVIDIA Quadro 400 vs NVIDIA Tesla K40c
4
NVIDIA Quadro 410 vs NVIDIA Quadro 400
5
NVIDIA Tesla T4 vs NVIDIA Quadro 400
6
NVIDIA Quadro 400 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 8 GB
7
NVIDIA RTX A6000 vs NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 32 GB
8
NVIDIA Quadro 400 vs NVIDIA Quadro K6000
9
NVIDIA Quadro 400 vs NVIDIA Quadro M6000
10
NVIDIA Quadro 400 vs NVIDIA Tesla P100 DGXS
Related News
1
Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation
2
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
3
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
4
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
5
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
6
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
7
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
8
First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD
9
NVIDIA Grace CPU Benchmark Results Released, Stunning Performance
10
Minisforum Launches UM890 Pro Mini PC with R9 8945HS and Dual USB4 Ports
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy