NVIDIA Quadro 4000 Mac Edition vs NVIDIA Quadro K5000 SYNC
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1792MB VRAM Quadro 4000 Mac Edition and 4GB VRAM Quadro K5000 SYNC to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro K5000 SYNC 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 7 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 1792GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (172.8GB/s vs 89.86GB/s)
1280 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (122W vs 142W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro 4000 Mac Edition
0.486 TFLOPS
Quadro K5000 SYNC
+346%
2.169 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2011
Release Date
Jan 2013
Quadro
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
702 MHz
Memory Clock
1350 MHz
Memory
1792MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
89.86GB/s
Bandwidth
172.8GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
8
SM Count
-
256
Shading Units
1536
32
TMUs
128
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
512 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
7.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
22.59 GPixel/s
15.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
90.37 GTexel/s
-
-
-
486.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.169 TFLOPS
243.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
90.37 GFLOPS
Board Design
142W
TDP
122W
300 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x DVI
1x DisplayPort
1x S-Video
Outputs
2x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.2
1x SDI
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
GF100
GPU Name
GK104
-
-
-
Fermi
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
3.1 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
529 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
2.0
CUDA
3.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1
