NVIDIA Quadro 4000 Mac Edition vs NVIDIA RTX A6000
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1792MB VRAM Quadro 4000 Mac Edition and 48GB VRAM RTX A6000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro 4000 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Lower TDP (142W vs 300W)
NVIDIA RTX A6000 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1800MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 1792GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (768.0GB/s vs 89.86GB/s)
10496 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro 4000 Mac Edition
0.486 TFLOPS
RTX A6000
+7865%
38.71 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2011
Release Date
Oct 2020
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Ampere
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1410 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1800 MHz
702 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
1792MB
Memory Size
48GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
89.86GB/s
Bandwidth
768.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
8
SM Count
84
256
Shading Units
10752
32
TMUs
336
32
ROPs
112
-
Tensor Cores
336
-
RT Cores
84
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
7.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
201.6 GPixel/s
15.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
604.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
38.71 TFLOPS
486.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
38.71 TFLOPS
243.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
604.8 GFLOPS
Board Design
142W
TDP
300W
300 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
1x DVI
1x DisplayPort
1x S-Video
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS
Graphics Processor
GF100
GPU Name
GA102
-
-
-
Fermi
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
40 nm
Process Size
8 nm
3.1 billion
Transistors
28.3 billion
529 mm²
Die Size
628 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.0
CUDA
8.6
5.1
Shader Model
6.7
