Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro 4000 vs Intel Arctic Sound-M

NVIDIA Quadro 4000 vs Intel Arctic Sound-M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro 4000 and 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro 4000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (142W vs 500W)
Intel Arctic Sound-M 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 2 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 89.86GB/s)
7936 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro 4000
0.486 TFLOPS
Arctic Sound M +2934%
14.75 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2010
Release Date
Jan 2022
Quadro
Generation
Data Center GPU
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
702 MHz
Memory Clock
1200 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2e
256bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
89.86GB/s
Bandwidth
1229GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
8
SM Count
-
256
Shading Units
8192
32
TMUs
256
32
ROPs
128
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
8 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

7.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
115.2 GPixel/s
15.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
230.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
29.49 TFLOPS
486.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
14.75 TFLOPS
243.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
3.686 TFLOPS

Board Design

142W
TDP
500W
300 W
Suggested PSU
900 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS

Graphics Processor

GF100
GPU Name
Arctic Sound
GF100-825-A3
GPU Variant
-
Fermi
Architecture
Generation 12.5
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
40 nm
Process Size
10 nm
3.1 billion
Transistors
8 billion
529 mm²
Die Size
190 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
2.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy