Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro 4000 vs NVIDIA RTX A5500 Mobile

NVIDIA Quadro 4000 vs NVIDIA RTX A5500 Mobile

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro 4000 and 16GB VRAM RTX A5500 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro 4000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (142W vs 165W)
NVIDIA RTX A5500 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1500MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 89.86GB/s)
7168 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro 4000
0.486 TFLOPS
RTX A5500 Mobile +4482%
22.27 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2010
Release Date
Mar 2022
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Ampere-M
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
975 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1500 MHz
702 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
89.86GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
8
SM Count
58
256
Shading Units
7424
32
TMUs
232
32
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
232
-
RT Cores
58
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

7.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
144.0 GPixel/s
15.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
348.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
22.27 TFLOPS
486.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
22.27 TFLOPS
243.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
348.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

142W
TDP
165W
300 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GF100
GPU Name
GA103
GF100-825-A3
GPU Variant
-
Fermi
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
40 nm
Process Size
8 nm
3.1 billion
Transistors
22 billion
529 mm²
Die Size
496 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.0
CUDA
8.6
5.1
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy