Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro 4000 vs NVIDIA Tesla K20c

NVIDIA Quadro 4000 vs NVIDIA Tesla K20c

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro 4000 and 5GB VRAM Tesla K20c to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro 4000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (142W vs 225W)
NVIDIA Tesla K20c 's Advantages
Released 2 years late
More VRAM (5GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (208.0GB/s vs 89.86GB/s)
2240 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro 4000
0.486 TFLOPS
Tesla K20c +625%
3.524 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2010
Release Date
Nov 2012
Quadro
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
702 MHz
Memory Clock
1300 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
5GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
320bit
89.86GB/s
Bandwidth
208.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
8
SM Count
-
256
Shading Units
2496
32
TMUs
208
32
ROPs
40
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
512 KB
L2 Cache
1280 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

7.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
36.71 GPixel/s
15.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
146.8 GTexel/s
-
-
-
486.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.524 TFLOPS
243.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1175 GFLOPS

Board Design

142W
TDP
225W
300 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GF100
GPU Name
GK110
GF100-825-A3
GPU Variant
GK110-885-KA-A1
Fermi
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
3.1 billion
Transistors
7.08 billion
529 mm²
Die Size
561 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
2.0
CUDA
3.5
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy