Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro 4000 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 360M

NVIDIA Quadro 4000 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 360M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro 4000 and 256MB VRAM Quadro FX 360M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro 4000 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 6 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (89.86GB/s vs 9.600GB/s)
240 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 360M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (17W vs 142W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro 4000 +1769%
0.486 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 360M
0.026 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2010
Release Date
May 2007
Quadro
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
702 MHz
Memory Clock
600 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR2
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
89.86GB/s
Bandwidth
9.600GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
8
SM Count
2
256
Shading Units
16
32
TMUs
8
32
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
16 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

7.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.600 GPixel/s
15.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
3.200 GTexel/s
-
-
-
486.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
25.60 GFLOPS
243.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

142W
TDP
17W
300 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GF100
GPU Name
G86
GF100-825-A3
GPU Variant
NB8M-GLM
Fermi
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
80 nm
3.1 billion
Transistors
0.21 billion
529 mm²
Die Size
127 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
2.0
CUDA
1.1
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy