NVIDIA Quadro 4000 vs Intel Data Center GPU Max Subsystem
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro 4000 and 128GB VRAM Data Center GPU Max Subsystem to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro 4000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (142W vs 2400W)
Intel Data Center GPU Max Subsystem 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1600MHz
More VRAM (128GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (3205GB/s vs 89.86GB/s)
16128 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro 4000
0.486 TFLOPS
Data Center GPU Max Subsystem
+10688%
52.43 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Nov 2010
Release Date
Jan 2023
Quadro
Generation
Data Center GPU
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
900 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1600 MHz
702 MHz
Memory Clock
1565 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
128GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2e
256bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
89.86GB/s
Bandwidth
3205GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
8
SM Count
-
256
Shading Units
16384
32
TMUs
1024
32
ROPs
0
-
Tensor Cores
1024
-
RT Cores
128
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per EU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
408 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
7.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
15.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1638 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
52.43 TFLOPS
486.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
52.43 TFLOPS
243.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
52.43 TFLOPS
Board Design
142W
TDP
2400W
300 W
Suggested PSU
2800 W
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin
Graphics Processor
GF100
GPU Name
Ponte Vecchio
GF100-825-A3
GPU Variant
-
Fermi
Architecture
Generation 12.5
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
40 nm
Process Size
10 nm
3.1 billion
Transistors
100 billion
529 mm²
Die Size
1280 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
2.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.6
