Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro 4000 vs NVIDIA Quadro K4200

NVIDIA Quadro 4000 vs NVIDIA Quadro K4200

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro 4000 and 4GB VRAM Quadro K4200 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K4200 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock784MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (172.8GB/s vs 89.86GB/s)
1088 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (108W vs 142W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro 4000
0.486 TFLOPS
Quadro K4200 +333%
2.107 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2010
Release Date
Jul 2014
Quadro
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
771 MHz
-
Boost Clock
784 MHz
702 MHz
Memory Clock
1350 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
89.86GB/s
Bandwidth
172.8GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
8
SM Count
-
256
Shading Units
1344
32
TMUs
112
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
512 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

7.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
21.95 GPixel/s
15.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
87.81 GTexel/s
-
-
-
486.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.107 TFLOPS
243.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
87.81 GFLOPS

Board Design

142W
TDP
108W
300 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GF100
GPU Name
GK104
GF100-825-A3
GPU Variant
GK104-850-A2
Fermi
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
3.1 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
529 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
2.0
CUDA
3.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy