Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro 4000 vs NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile

NVIDIA Quadro 4000 vs NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro 4000 and 4GB VRAM Quadro T2000 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1785MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (128.1GB/s vs 89.86GB/s)
768 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (60W vs 142W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro 4000
0.486 TFLOPS
Quadro T2000 Mobile +652%
3.656 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2010
Release Date
May 2019
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1575 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1785 MHz
702 MHz
Memory Clock
2001 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
89.86GB/s
Bandwidth
128.1GB/s

Render Config

8
SM Count
16
-
Compute Units
-
256
Shading Units
1024
32
TMUs
64
32
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB

Theoretical Performance

7.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
57.12 GPixel/s
15.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
114.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
7.311 TFLOPS
486.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.656 TFLOPS
243.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
114.2 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GF100
GPU Name
TU117
GF100-825-A3
GPU Variant
-
Fermi
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
12 nm
3.1 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
529 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Board Design

142W
TDP
60W
300 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.0
CUDA
7.5
5.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy