Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro 4000 vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI50

NVIDIA Quadro 4000 vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI50

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro 4000 and 16GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI50 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro 4000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (142W vs 300W)
AMD Radeon Instinct MI50 's Advantages
Released 8 years late
Boost Clock1746MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1020GB/s vs 89.86GB/s)
3584 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro 4000
0.486 TFLOPS
Radeon Instinct MI50 +2659%
13.41 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2010
Release Date
Nov 2018
Quadro
Generation
Radeon Instinct
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1200 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1746 MHz
702 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2
256bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
89.86GB/s
Bandwidth
1020GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
60
8
SM Count
-
256
Shading Units
3840
32
TMUs
240
32
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

7.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
111.7 GPixel/s
15.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
419.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
26.82 TFLOPS
486.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
13.41 TFLOPS
243.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
6.705 TFLOPS

Board Design

142W
TDP
300W
300 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort
Outputs
1x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GF100
GPU Name
Vega 20
GF100-825-A3
GPU Variant
Vega 20 GLXT
Fermi
Architecture
GCN 5.1
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
7 nm
3.1 billion
Transistors
13.23 billion
529 mm²
Die Size
331 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy