NVIDIA Quadro 4000 vs NVIDIA Tesla C2070
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro 4000 and 6GB VRAM Tesla C2070 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro 4000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (142W vs 238W)
NVIDIA Tesla C2070 's Advantages
Released 8 months late
More VRAM (6GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (143.4GB/s vs 89.86GB/s)
192 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro 4000
0.486 TFLOPS
Tesla C2070
+111%
1.028 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Nov 2010
Release Date
Jul 2011
Quadro
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
702 MHz
Memory Clock
747 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
89.86GB/s
Bandwidth
143.4GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
8
SM Count
14
256
Shading Units
448
32
TMUs
56
32
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
7.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.07 GPixel/s
15.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
32.14 GTexel/s
-
-
-
486.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1028 GFLOPS
243.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
513.9 GFLOPS
Board Design
142W
TDP
238W
300 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort
Outputs
1x DVI
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GF100
GPU Name
GF100
GF100-825-A3
GPU Variant
-
Fermi
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
40 nm
3.1 billion
Transistors
3.1 billion
529 mm²
Die Size
529 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
2.0
CUDA
2.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1
