Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro 4000M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition

NVIDIA Quadro 4000M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro 4000M and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro 4000M 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 5 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (80.00GB/s vs 20.80GB/s)
304 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Lower TDP (42W vs 100W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro 4000M +852%
0.638 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition
0.067 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2011
Release Date
Sep 2008
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
625 MHz
Memory Clock
650 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
80.00GB/s
Bandwidth
20.80GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
7
SM Count
4
336
Shading Units
32
56
TMUs
16
32
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

6.650 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.160 GPixel/s
26.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
8.320 GTexel/s
-
-
-
638.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
66.56 GFLOPS
53.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

100W
TDP
42W
-
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GF104
GPU Name
G84
N12E-Q3-A1
GPU Variant
-
Fermi
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
80 nm
1.95 billion
Transistors
0.289 billion
332 mm²
Die Size
169 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
2.1
CUDA
1.1
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy