Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro 4000M vs NVIDIA Quadro K200M

NVIDIA Quadro 4000M vs NVIDIA Quadro K200M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro 4000M and 1024MB VRAM Quadro K200M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro 4000M 's Advantages
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (80.00GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
144 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K200M 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 6 months late
Lower TDP (35W vs 100W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro 4000M +95%
0.638 TFLOPS
Quadro K200M
0.326 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2011
Release Date
Aug 2014
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
625 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
80.00GB/s
Bandwidth
12.80GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
7
SM Count
-
336
Shading Units
192
56
TMUs
16
32
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
512 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

6.650 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.400 GPixel/s
26.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
13.60 GTexel/s
-
-
-
638.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
326.4 GFLOPS
53.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
13.60 GFLOPS

Board Design

100W
TDP
35W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
-
-

Graphics Processor

GF104
GPU Name
GK107
N12E-Q3-A1
GPU Variant
N14M-Q1
Fermi
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.95 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
332 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
2.1
CUDA
3.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy