CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA Quadro 410 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 5600 Mac Edition
NVIDIA Quadro 410 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 5600 Mac Edition
VS
NVIDIA Quadro 410
NVIDIA Quadro FX 5600 Mac Edition
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro 410 and 1536MB VRAM Quadro FX 5600 Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro 410 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 5 months late
64 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (38W vs 171W)
NVIDIA Quadro FX 5600 Mac Edition 's Advantages
More VRAM (1536GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (76.80GB/s vs 14.26GB/s)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro 410
0.271 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 5600 Mac Edition
+36%
0.369 TFLOPS
Quadro 410
VS
Quadro FX 5600 Mac Edition
Graphics Card
Aug 2012
Release Date
Mar 2007
Quadro
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
891 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
1536MB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
384bit
14.26GB/s
Bandwidth
76.80GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
16
-
Compute Units
-
192
Shading Units
128
16
TMUs
32
8
ROPs
24
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
-
128 KB
L2 Cache
96 KB
Theoretical Performance
2.824 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
14.40 GPixel/s
11.30 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
38.40 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
271.1 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
368.6 GFLOPS
11.30 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Graphics Processor
GK107
GPU Name
G80
GK107-810-A2
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
90 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
0.681 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
484 mm²
Board Design
38W
TDP
171W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI
None
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1 (1.0)
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
1.0
5.1
Shader Model
4.0
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA Quadro P620 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro 410
2
NVIDIA Quadro 410 vs NVIDIA Quadro 400
3
NVIDIA Quadro 410 vs NVIDIA Tesla M10
4
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max Q vs NVIDIA Quadro 410
5
NVIDIA Quadro 410 vs NVIDIA Tesla C2050
6
NVIDIA Quadro Plex 7000 vs NVIDIA Quadro 410
7
NVIDIA GRID K220Q vs NVIDIA Quadro 410
8
NVIDIA Quadro 410 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800
9
NVIDIA Quadro 410 vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI300
10
NVIDIA Quadro 410 vs NVIDIA GRID RTX T10 4
Related News
1
Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 to Feature Frame Interpolation for GPU: A Game-Changing Experience
2
Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage
3
Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation
4
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
5
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
6
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
7
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
8
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
9
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
10
First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy