Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro 410 vs NVIDIA Quadro K3000M

NVIDIA Quadro 410 vs NVIDIA Quadro K3000M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro 410 and 2GB VRAM Quadro K3000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro 410 's Advantages
Lower TDP (38W vs 75W)
NVIDIA Quadro K3000M 's Advantages
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (89.60GB/s vs 14.26GB/s)
384 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro 410
0.271 TFLOPS
Quadro K3000M +177%
0.753 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2012
Release Date
Jun 2012
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
891 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
14.26GB/s
Bandwidth
89.60GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
-
-
192
Shading Units
576
16
TMUs
48
8
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
128 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.824 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.848 GPixel/s
11.30 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
31.39 GTexel/s
-
-
-
271.1 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
753.4 GFLOPS
11.30 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
31.39 GFLOPS

Board Design

38W
TDP
75W
200 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GK107
GPU Name
GK104
GK107-810-A2
GPU Variant
N14E-Q1-A2
Kepler
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.1
3.0
CUDA
3.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy