NVIDIA Quadro 4100 vs Intel Data Center GPU Flex 140
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro 4100 and 6GB VRAM Data Center GPU Flex 140 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro 4100 's Advantages
320 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (35W vs 75W)
Intel Data Center GPU Flex 140 's Advantages
Boost Clock1950MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (186.0GB/s vs 57.02GB/s)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro 4100
2.142 TFLOPS
Data Center GPU Flex 140
+86%
3.994 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Unknown
Release Date
Aug 2022
Quadro
Generation
Data Center GPU
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1600 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1950 MHz
891 MHz
Memory Clock
1937 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
6GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
96bit
57.02GB/s
Bandwidth
186.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
1344
Shading Units
1024
112
TMUs
64
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
8
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
22.32 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
62.40 GPixel/s
89.26 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
124.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
7.987 TFLOPS
2.142 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.994 TFLOPS
89.26 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
35W
TDP
75W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 2.0
-
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GK104
GPU Name
DG2-128
-
GPU Variant
ACM-G11
Kepler
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
6 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
157 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.6
