Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro 4100 vs NVIDIA Tesla C1060

NVIDIA Quadro 4100 vs NVIDIA Tesla C1060

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro 4100 and 4GB VRAM Tesla C1060 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro 4100 's Advantages
1104 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (35W vs 188W)
NVIDIA Tesla C1060 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (102.4GB/s vs 57.02GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro 4100 +244%
2.142 TFLOPS
Tesla C1060
0.622 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
Apr 2009
Quadro
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
891 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
512bit
57.02GB/s
Bandwidth
102.4GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
30
-
Compute Units
-
1344
Shading Units
240
112
TMUs
80
32
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

22.32 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
19.52 GPixel/s
89.26 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
48.80 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
2.142 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
622.1 GFLOPS
89.26 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
77.76 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GK104
GPU Name
GT200B
-
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²

Board Design

35W
TDP
188W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
1.3
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy