Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro 5000 vs Intel Arctic Sound 2T

NVIDIA Quadro 5000 vs Intel Arctic Sound 2T

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 0GB VRAM Quadro 5000 and 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound 2T to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro 5000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (152W vs 500W)
Intel Arctic Sound 2T 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 11 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 120.0GB/s)
7328 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro 5000
0.722 TFLOPS
Arctic Sound 2T +1814%
13.82 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2011
Release Date
Jan 2021
Quadro
Generation
Xe Graphics
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
750 MHz
Memory Clock
1200 MHz

Memory

GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2e
320bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
120.0GB/s
Bandwidth
1229GB/s

Render Config

11
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
352
Shading Units
7680
44
TMUs
240
40
ROPs
120
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
640 KB
L2 Cache
8 MB

Theoretical Performance

11.29 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
108.0 GPixel/s
22.57 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
216.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
27.65 TFLOPS
722.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
13.82 TFLOPS
361.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
3.456 TFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GF100
GPU Name
Arctic Sound
GF100-850-A3
GPU Variant
-
Fermi
Architecture
Generation 12.5
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
40 nm
Process Size
10 nm
3.1 billion
Transistors
8 billion
529 mm²
Die Size
190 mm²

Board Design

152W
TDP
500W
450 W
Suggested PSU
900 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
2.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy