Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro 5000 vs NVIDIA Quadro K3000M

NVIDIA Quadro 5000 vs NVIDIA Quadro K3000M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 0GB VRAM Quadro 5000 and 2GB VRAM Quadro K3000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro 5000 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (120.0GB/s vs 89.60GB/s)
NVIDIA Quadro K3000M 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 4 months late
224 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (75W vs 152W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro 5000
0.722 TFLOPS
Quadro K3000M +4%
0.753 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2011
Release Date
Jun 2012
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
750 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz

Memory

GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
320bit
Memory Bus
256bit
120.0GB/s
Bandwidth
89.60GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
11
SM Count
-
352
Shading Units
576
44
TMUs
48
40
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
640 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

11.29 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.848 GPixel/s
22.57 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
31.39 GTexel/s
-
-
-
722.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
753.4 GFLOPS
361.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
31.39 GFLOPS

Board Design

152W
TDP
75W
450 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GF100
GPU Name
GK104
GF100-850-A3
GPU Variant
N14E-Q1-A2
Fermi
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
3.1 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
529 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
2.0
CUDA
3.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy