NVIDIA Quadro 5000 vs Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 0GB VRAM Quadro 5000 and 16GB VRAM Data Center GPU Flex 170 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock2050MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 120.0GB/s)
3744 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (150W vs 152W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro 5000
0.722 TFLOPS
Data Center GPU Flex 170
+2225%
16.79 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Feb 2011
Release Date
Aug 2022
Quadro
Generation
Data Center GPU
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1950 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2050 MHz
750 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
320bit
Memory Bus
256bit
120.0GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
11
SM Count
-
352
Shading Units
4096
44
TMUs
256
40
ROPs
128
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
32
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
640 KB
L2 Cache
16 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
11.29 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
262.4 GPixel/s
22.57 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
524.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
33.59 TFLOPS
722.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
16.79 TFLOPS
361.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
152W
TDP
150W
450 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 2.0
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GF100
GPU Name
DG2-512
GF100-850-A3
GPU Variant
ACM-G10
Fermi
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
6 nm
3.1 billion
Transistors
21.7 billion
529 mm²
Die Size
406 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.6
