Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro 5000M vs NVIDIA Quadro K3000M

NVIDIA Quadro 5000M vs NVIDIA Quadro K3000M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1792MB VRAM Quadro 5000M and 2GB VRAM Quadro K3000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K3000M 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 11 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 1792GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (89.60GB/s vs 76.80GB/s)
256 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (75W vs 100W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro 5000M
0.518 TFLOPS
Quadro K3000M +45%
0.753 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2010
Release Date
Jun 2012
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
600 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz

Memory

1792MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
76.80GB/s
Bandwidth
89.60GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
10
SM Count
-
320
Shading Units
576
40
TMUs
48
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
512 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

8.100 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.848 GPixel/s
16.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
31.39 GTexel/s
-
-
-
518.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
753.4 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
31.39 GFLOPS

Board Design

100W
TDP
75W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
-
-

Graphics Processor

GF100
GPU Name
GK104
N10E-GLM5-A3
GPU Variant
N14E-Q1-A2
Fermi
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
3.1 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
529 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
2.0
CUDA
3.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy