Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro 5000M vs NVIDIA Quadro K4200

NVIDIA Quadro 5000M vs NVIDIA Quadro K4200

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1792MB VRAM Quadro 5000M and 4GB VRAM Quadro K4200 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro 5000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (100W vs 108W)
NVIDIA Quadro K4200 's Advantages
Released 4 years late
Boost Clock784MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1792GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (172.8GB/s vs 76.80GB/s)
1024 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro 5000M
0.518 TFLOPS
Quadro K4200 +306%
2.107 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2010
Release Date
Jul 2014
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
771 MHz
-
Boost Clock
784 MHz
600 MHz
Memory Clock
1350 MHz

Memory

1792MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
76.80GB/s
Bandwidth
172.8GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
10
SM Count
-
320
Shading Units
1344
40
TMUs
112
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
512 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

8.100 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
21.95 GPixel/s
16.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
87.81 GTexel/s
-
-
-
518.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.107 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
87.81 GFLOPS

Board Design

100W
TDP
108W
-
Suggested PSU
300 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
-
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GF100
GPU Name
GK104
N10E-GLM5-A3
GPU Variant
GK104-850-A2
Fermi
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
3.1 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
529 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
2.0
CUDA
3.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy