Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro 5000M vs AMD Radeon PRO W7900

NVIDIA Quadro 5000M vs AMD Radeon PRO W7900

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1792MB VRAM Quadro 5000M and 48GB VRAM Radeon PRO W7900 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro 5000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (100W vs 295W)
AMD Radeon PRO W7900 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock2495MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (864.0GB/s vs 76.80GB/s)
5824 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro 5000M
0.518 TFLOPS
Radeon PRO W7900 +11737%
61.32 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2010
Release Date
Apr 2023
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Radeon Pro Navi
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1855 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2495 MHz
600 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz

Memory

1792MB
Memory Size
48GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
76.80GB/s
Bandwidth
864.0GB/s

Render Config

10
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
96
320
Shading Units
6144
40
TMUs
384
32
ROPs
192
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
96
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
256 KB per Array
512 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB

Theoretical Performance

8.100 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
479.0 GPixel/s
16.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
958.1 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
122.6 TFLOPS
518.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
61.32 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
1.916 TFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GF100
GPU Name
Navi 31
N10E-GLM5-A3
GPU Variant
Navi 31
Fermi
Architecture
RDNA 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
5 nm
3.1 billion
Transistors
57.7 billion
529 mm²
Die Size
529 mm²

Board Design

100W
TDP
295W
-
Suggested PSU
600 W
No outputs
Outputs
3x DisplayPort 2.1 1x mini-DisplayPort 2.1
-
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy