Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro 5000M vs NVIDIA GRID K160Q

NVIDIA Quadro 5000M vs NVIDIA GRID K160Q

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1792MB VRAM Quadro 5000M and 1024MB VRAM GRID K160Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro 5000M 's Advantages
More VRAM (1792GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (76.80GB/s vs 28.51GB/s)
128 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (100W vs 130W)
NVIDIA GRID K160Q 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 11 months late

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro 5000M +58%
0.518 TFLOPS
GRID K160Q
0.326 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2010
Release Date
Jun 2013
Quadro Mobile
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
600 MHz
Memory Clock
891 MHz

Memory

1792MB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
76.80GB/s
Bandwidth
28.51GB/s

Render Config

10
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
320
Shading Units
192
40
TMUs
16
32
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
512 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

8.100 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.400 GPixel/s
16.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
13.60 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
518.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
326.4 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
13.60 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GF100
GPU Name
GK107
N10E-GLM5-A3
GPU Variant
-
Fermi
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
3.1 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
529 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²

Board Design

100W
TDP
130W
-
Suggested PSU
300 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
2.0
CUDA
3.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy