NVIDIA Quadro 5010M vs NVIDIA Quadro K5000 SYNC
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro 5010M and 4GB VRAM Quadro K5000 SYNC to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro 5010M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (100W vs 122W)
NVIDIA Quadro K5000 SYNC 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 11 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (172.8GB/s vs 83.20GB/s)
1152 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro 5010M
0.691 TFLOPS
Quadro K5000 SYNC
+213%
2.169 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Feb 2011
Release Date
Jan 2013
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
650 MHz
Memory Clock
1350 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
83.20GB/s
Bandwidth
172.8GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
12
SM Count
-
384
Shading Units
1536
48
TMUs
128
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
512 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
10.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
22.59 GPixel/s
21.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
90.37 GTexel/s
-
-
-
691.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.169 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
90.37 GFLOPS
Board Design
100W
TDP
122W
-
Suggested PSU
300 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.2
1x SDI
-
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
GF110
GPU Name
GK104
N12E-Q5
GPU Variant
-
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
3 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
520 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
2.0
CUDA
3.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1
