Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro 5010M vs NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM3 32 GB

NVIDIA Quadro 5010M vs NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM3 32 GB

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro 5010M and 32GB VRAM Tesla V100 SXM3 32 GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro 5010M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (100W vs 250W)
NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM3 32 GB 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1530MHz
More VRAM (32GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (897.0GB/s vs 83.20GB/s)
4736 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro 5010M
0.691 TFLOPS
Tesla V100 SXM3 32 GB +2167%
15.67 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2011
Release Date
Mar 2018
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1290 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1530 MHz
650 MHz
Memory Clock
876 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
32GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2
256bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
83.20GB/s
Bandwidth
897.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
12
SM Count
80
384
Shading Units
5120
48
TMUs
320
32
ROPs
128
-
Tensor Cores
640
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

10.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
195.8 GPixel/s
21.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
489.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
31.33 TFLOPS
691.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
15.67 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
7.834 TFLOPS

Board Design

100W
TDP
250W
-
Suggested PSU
600 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GF110
GPU Name
GV100
N12E-Q5
GPU Variant
-
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
Volta
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
12 nm
3 billion
Transistors
21.1 billion
520 mm²
Die Size
815 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.0
CUDA
7.0
5.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy