Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro 600 vs NVIDIA GRID K520Q

NVIDIA Quadro 600 vs NVIDIA GRID K520Q

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Quadro 600 and 4GB VRAM GRID K520Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro 600 's Advantages
Lower TDP (40W vs 225W)
NVIDIA GRID K520Q 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 7 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
1440 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro 600
0.246 TFLOPS
GRID K520Q +830%
2.289 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2010
Release Date
Jul 2014
Quadro
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
25.60GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s

Render Config

2
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
96
Shading Units
1536
16
TMUs
128
8
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
256 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

2.560 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
23.84 GPixel/s
10.24 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
95.36 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
245.8 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.289 TFLOPS
20.48 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
95.36 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GF108
GPU Name
GK104
-
GPU Variant
-
Fermi
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.585 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
116 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Board Design

40W
TDP
225W
200 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
2.1
CUDA
3.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy