Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro 600 vs NVIDIA Quadro M3000M

NVIDIA Quadro 600 vs NVIDIA Quadro M3000M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Quadro 600 and 4GB VRAM Quadro M3000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro 600 's Advantages
Lower TDP (40W vs 75W)
NVIDIA Quadro M3000M 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 8 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.4GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
928 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro 600
0.246 TFLOPS
Quadro M3000M +773%
2.15 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2010
Release Date
Aug 2015
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
25.60GB/s
Bandwidth
160.4GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
2
SM Count
-
96
Shading Units
1024
16
TMUs
64
8
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.560 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
33.60 GPixel/s
10.24 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
67.20 GTexel/s
-
-
-
245.8 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.150 TFLOPS
20.48 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
67.20 GFLOPS

Board Design

40W
TDP
75W
200 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GF108
GPU Name
GM204
-
GPU Variant
N16E-Q1-A1
Fermi
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.585 billion
Transistors
5.2 billion
116 mm²
Die Size
398 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.1
CUDA
5.2
5.1
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy