Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro 6000 SDI vs NVIDIA Quadro K2000D

NVIDIA Quadro 6000 SDI vs NVIDIA Quadro K2000D

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Quadro 6000 SDI and 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000D to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro 6000 SDI 's Advantages
More VRAM (6GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (143.4GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
64 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K2000D 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 8 months late
Lower TDP (51W vs 231W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro 6000 SDI +40%
1.028 TFLOPS
Quadro K2000D
0.733 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2011
Release Date
Mar 2013
Quadro
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
747 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
143.4GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
14
SM Count
-
448
Shading Units
384
56
TMUs
32
48
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
768 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

16.07 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.632 GPixel/s
32.14 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
30.53 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1028 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
732.7 GFLOPS
513.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
30.53 GFLOPS

Board Design

231W
TDP
51W
550 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1x S-Video 2x SDI
Outputs
2x DVI 1x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GF100
GPU Name
GK107
-
GPU Variant
GK107-301-A2
Fermi
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
3.1 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
529 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
2.0
CUDA
3.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy