Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro 6000 SDI vs NVIDIA Quadro M2000

NVIDIA Quadro 6000 SDI vs NVIDIA Quadro M2000

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Quadro 6000 SDI and 4GB VRAM Quadro M2000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro 6000 SDI 's Advantages
More VRAM (6GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (143.4GB/s vs 105.8GB/s)
NVIDIA Quadro M2000 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1163MHz
320 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (75W vs 231W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro 6000 SDI
1.028 TFLOPS
Quadro M2000 +73%
1.786 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2011
Release Date
Apr 2016
Quadro
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
796 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1163 MHz
747 MHz
Memory Clock
1653 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
143.4GB/s
Bandwidth
105.8GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
14
SM Count
-
448
Shading Units
768
56
TMUs
48
48
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
768 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

16.07 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
37.22 GPixel/s
32.14 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
55.82 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1028 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.786 TFLOPS
513.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
55.82 GFLOPS

Board Design

231W
TDP
75W
550 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1x S-Video 2x SDI
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GF100
GPU Name
GM206
-
GPU Variant
GM206-875-A1
Fermi
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
3.1 billion
Transistors
2.94 billion
529 mm²
Die Size
228 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.0
CUDA
5.2
5.1
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy