Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro 6000 SDI vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI250X

NVIDIA Quadro 6000 SDI vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI250X

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Quadro 6000 SDI and 128GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI250X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro 6000 SDI 's Advantages
Lower TDP (231W vs 500W)
AMD Radeon Instinct MI250X 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1700MHz
More VRAM (128GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (3277GB/s vs 143.4GB/s)
13632 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro 6000 SDI
1.028 TFLOPS
Radeon Instinct MI250X +4556%
47.87 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2011
Release Date
Nov 2021
Quadro
Generation
Radeon Instinct
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1700 MHz
747 MHz
Memory Clock
1600 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
128GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2e
384bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
143.4GB/s
Bandwidth
3277GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
220
14
SM Count
-
448
Shading Units
14080
56
TMUs
880
48
ROPs
0
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
768 KB
L2 Cache
16 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

16.07 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
32.14 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1496 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
383.0 TFLOPS
1028 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
47.87 TFLOPS
513.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
47.87 TFLOPS

Board Design

231W
TDP
500W
550 W
Suggested PSU
900 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1x S-Video 2x SDI
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GF100
GPU Name
Aldebaran
-
GPU Variant
Aldebaran XT
Fermi
Architecture
CDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
6 nm
3.1 billion
Transistors
58.2 billion
529 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
2.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
N/A

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy