Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro 6000 vs NVIDIA GRID K260Q

NVIDIA Quadro 6000 vs NVIDIA GRID K260Q

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Quadro 6000 and 2GB VRAM GRID K260Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro 6000 's Advantages
More VRAM (6GB vs 2GB)
Lower TDP (204W vs 225W)
NVIDIA GRID K260Q 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 6 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 143.4GB/s)
1088 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro 6000
1.028 TFLOPS
GRID K260Q +122%
2.289 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2010
Release Date
Jun 2013
Quadro
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
747 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
143.4GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
14
SM Count
-
448
Shading Units
1536
56
TMUs
128
48
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
768 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

16.07 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
23.84 GPixel/s
32.14 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
95.36 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1028 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.289 TFLOPS
513.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
95.36 GFLOPS

Board Design

204W
TDP
225W
550 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GF100
GPU Name
GK104
GF100-850-A3
GPU Variant
-
Fermi
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
3.1 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
529 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
2.0
CUDA
3.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy