Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro 6000 vs NVIDIA Quadro K3100M

NVIDIA Quadro 6000 vs NVIDIA Quadro K3100M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Quadro 6000 and 4GB VRAM Quadro K3100M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro 6000 's Advantages
More VRAM (6GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (143.4GB/s vs 102.4GB/s)
NVIDIA Quadro K3100M 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 7 months late
320 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (75W vs 204W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro 6000
1.028 TFLOPS
Quadro K3100M +5%
1.084 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2010
Release Date
Jul 2013
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
747 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
143.4GB/s
Bandwidth
102.4GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
14
SM Count
-
448
Shading Units
768
56
TMUs
64
48
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
768 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

16.07 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
11.30 GPixel/s
32.14 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
45.18 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1028 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1084 GFLOPS
513.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
45.18 GFLOPS

Board Design

204W
TDP
75W
550 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GF100
GPU Name
GK104
GF100-850-A3
GPU Variant
N15E-Q1-A2
Fermi
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
3.1 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
529 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
2.0
CUDA
3.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy