Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro 6000 vs NVIDIA Tesla K20X

NVIDIA Quadro 6000 vs NVIDIA Tesla K20X

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Quadro 6000 and 6GB VRAM Tesla K20X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro 6000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (204W vs 235W)
NVIDIA Tesla K20X 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 11 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (249.6GB/s vs 143.4GB/s)
2240 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro 6000
1.028 TFLOPS
Tesla K20X +282%
3.935 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2010
Release Date
Nov 2012
Quadro
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
747 MHz
Memory Clock
1300 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
384bit
143.4GB/s
Bandwidth
249.6GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
14
SM Count
-
448
Shading Units
2688
56
TMUs
224
48
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
768 KB
L2 Cache
1536 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

16.07 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
40.99 GPixel/s
32.14 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
164.0 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1028 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.935 TFLOPS
513.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1312 GFLOPS

Board Design

204W
TDP
235W
550 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GF100
GPU Name
GK110
GF100-850-A3
GPU Variant
-
Fermi
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
3.1 billion
Transistors
7.08 billion
529 mm²
Die Size
561 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
2.0
CUDA
3.5
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy