Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro CX vs NVIDIA Jetson Orin Nano 4 GB

NVIDIA Quadro CX vs NVIDIA Jetson Orin Nano 4 GB

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1536MB VRAM Quadro CX and 4GB VRAM Jetson Orin Nano 4 GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro CX 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (76.80GB/s vs 34.14GB/s)
NVIDIA Jetson Orin Nano 4 GB 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 4 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 1536GB)
320 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (10W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro CX
0.462 TFLOPS
Jetson Orin Nano 4 GB +38%
0.64 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2008
Release Date
Mar 2023
Quadro CX
Generation
Tegra
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x4

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1067 MHz

Memory

1536MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
LPDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
64bit
76.80GB/s
Bandwidth
34.14GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
24
SM Count
4
192
Shading Units
512
64
TMUs
16
24
ROPs
8
-
Tensor Cores
16
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
192 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

14.45 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.000 GPixel/s
38.53 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
10.00 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
1280 GFLOPS
462.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
640.0 GFLOPS
57.79 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
320.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
10W
450 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1x S-Video
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GT200B
GPU Name
GA10B
-
-
-
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
55 nm
Process Size
8 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
Unknown
470 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
CUDA
8.6
4.0
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy