Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro CX vs NVIDIA Quadro K200M

NVIDIA Quadro CX vs NVIDIA Quadro K200M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1536MB VRAM Quadro CX and 1024MB VRAM Quadro K200M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro CX 's Advantages
More VRAM (1536GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (76.80GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
NVIDIA Quadro K200M 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 9 months late
Lower TDP (35W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro CX +41%
0.462 TFLOPS
Quadro K200M
0.326 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2008
Release Date
Aug 2014
Quadro CX
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

1536MB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
DDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
64bit
76.80GB/s
Bandwidth
12.80GB/s

Render Config

24
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
192
Shading Units
192
64
TMUs
16
24
ROPs
8
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
192 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB

Theoretical Performance

14.45 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.400 GPixel/s
38.53 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
13.60 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
462.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
326.4 GFLOPS
57.79 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
13.60 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GT200B
GPU Name
GK107
-
GPU Variant
N14M-Q1
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²

Board Design

150W
TDP
35W
450 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
1.3
CUDA
3.0
4.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy