CPU
GPU
SoC
Router
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
Router Ranking
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Router
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
Router Ranking
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA Quadro CX vs NVIDIA Jetson Orin Nano 8 GB
NVIDIA Quadro CX vs NVIDIA Jetson Orin Nano 8 GB
VS
NVIDIA Quadro CX
NVIDIA Jetson Orin Nano 8 GB
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1536MB VRAM Quadro CX and 8GB VRAM Jetson Orin Nano 8 GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro CX 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (76.80GB/s vs 68.29GB/s)
NVIDIA Jetson Orin Nano 8 GB 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 4 months late
More VRAM (8GB vs 1536GB)
832 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (15W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro CX
0.462 TFLOPS
Jetson Orin Nano 8 GB
+177%
1.28 TFLOPS
Quadro CX
VS
Jetson Orin Nano 8 GB
Graphics Card
Nov 2008
Release Date
Mar 2023
Quadro CX
Generation
Tegra
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x4
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1067 MHz
Memory
1536MB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
LPDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
76.80GB/s
Bandwidth
68.29GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
24
SM Count
8
192
Shading Units
1024
64
TMUs
32
24
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
32
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
192 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
14.45 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.00 GPixel/s
38.53 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
20.00 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
2.560 TFLOPS
462.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1280 GFLOPS
57.79 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
640.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
15W
450 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1x S-Video
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GT200B
GPU Name
GA10B
-
-
-
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
55 nm
Process Size
8 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
Unknown
470 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
CUDA
8.6
4.0
Shader Model
6.7
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA Quadro CX vs NVIDIA Quadro K620
2
NVIDIA Quadro CX vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M
3
NVIDIA Quadro CX vs NVIDIA Tesla P100 PCIe 12 GB
4
NVIDIA Quadro CX vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M
5
NVIDIA Quadro CX vs NVIDIA Tesla K40d
6
NVIDIA Quadro CX vs NVIDIA Quadro 2000M
7
NVIDIA Quadro CX vs NVIDIA Quadro P500 Mobile
8
NVIDIA Quadro CX vs NVIDIA Quadro K5200
9
NVIDIA Quadro CX vs NVIDIA Quadro P5000 Mobile
10
NVIDIA Quadro CX vs NVIDIA Quadro M4000
Related News
1
Intel Confirms Panther Lake Adopts 18A Process, ES0 Samples Already Sent to Customers
2
Complete Lineup of Core Ultra 200HX/H/U and Core 200H/U Revealed: 31 Models to Dazzle the Eyes
3
Amechi Unveils V1 Mini PC: Only 0.33L Volume with 150W Power Consumption
4
iPhone 17 Series Set for Major Design Overhaul: Camera Module Transformed into Sleek Strip
5
The Thinnest iPhone Ever! iPhone 17 Air Reportedly Enters Foxconn's NPI Stage
6
Apple Allegedly Cancels M4 Extreme, Originally Planned for Mac Pro with 64-Core CPU and 160-Core GPU
7
Cyberpunk 2077 Update 2.2: Intel Arrow Lake Gaming Performance Soars by 33%!
8
Intel Finally Achieves Frame Generation! 'F1 24' Becomes the First XeSS 2 Game
9
World's First! Intel Arc B580 Graphics Card Arrives Early
10
Linux Creator Criticizes AMD and Intel's x86 Microarchitecture: A Complete Disaster
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy