Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro CX vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M

NVIDIA Quadro CX vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1536MB VRAM Quadro CX and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1600M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro CX 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 5 months late
More VRAM (1536GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (76.80GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
160 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro CX +477%
0.462 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 1600M
0.08 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2008
Release Date
Jun 2007
Quadro CX
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-HE

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

1536MB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
76.80GB/s
Bandwidth
25.60GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
24
SM Count
4
192
Shading Units
32
64
TMUs
16
24
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
192 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

14.45 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.000 GPixel/s
38.53 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
10.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
462.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
80.00 GFLOPS
57.79 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

150W
TDP
50W
450 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GT200B
GPU Name
G84
-
GPU Variant
NB8P-GLM
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
80 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
0.289 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
169 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.3
CUDA
1.1
4.0
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy